- #Capture one vs lightroom full
- #Capture one vs lightroom software
- #Capture one vs lightroom Pc
- #Capture one vs lightroom professional
It just feels tedious for me, without enabling any advanced behaviour. First you must drag-and-drop files from the file system to a project, edit them and then drag and drop files from the project to the output queue. Capture One is more picky about direct camera support, but it does support DNG, so you can always convert to DNG first and then import.ĭXO is the most cumbersome in this regard. I might add that tethered shooting is perfectly integrated in the interface, a bonus for studio photographers. Import and export are very easy and I like how printing is also treated like an output option and how easy it’s to define your own presets.Ĭapture One has a very straightforward way for import and export, focusing on simplicity. For me, it would be incredible to output directly to iStock, so I can only hope a plugin will come.īibble also has a wide camera support, but they don’t support DNG (despite numerous customers requesting it, I might add). New in version 3 is the export system – you can publish from it directly to a service like Flikr.
It can also handle variations, has an unlimited history, snapshots and more. In two years, it still hasn’t convinced me to use it exclusively, but it’s simple enough to import photos in its database and process them.
#Capture one vs lightroom full
Lightroom also goes beyond the typical RAW processor, as it aims to be a full DAM (Digital Asset Manager). Lightroom has probably the widest camera support – it can read all camera formats under then sun and it also supports DNG (obviously, they invented it). They changed the UI completely from version 4 and copied many concepts from their competitors, but it’s still a bit confusing as buttons are all over the place.ĭXO suffers from the same problems as Bibble – a rather confusing interface, with options arranged not very intuitively for example, why is White Balance (a basic setting) placed after DXO Lighting (an advanced feature)? Still, in terms of speed and stability, it’s a huge improvement over DXO5. You can easily customize the interface to fit your own workflow, turn panels off, even customize the “nameplate” to your company name – a nice touch for when you’re working with a client.īibble is more of a mixed bag. Lightroom comes very close, but for it the keyword would be ‘customization’. It’s very easy to find the tools and the tabs are arranged in the proper order – from capture to details. I absolutely love Capture One‘s interface. InterfaceĪll four programs have remarkably similar interfaces: dark/gray color schemes, tabs and sliders.Īll interfaces look similar, but there are differences in organization and workflow So if you look at the images in the test and wonder why they’re not so good – it’s because I selected them to be like that. I believe that test images should not be perfect – how would I be able to check chromatic aberrations if the image was taken with a razor-sharp, $2000 lens? Or how could I evaluate highlight recovery for a perfectly-exposed scene? Or noise at low ISO? or… you get the picture. Again, some programs (DXO and Capture One) did not support it. Second of all, I initially had some nice architectural pictures from Milan and Paris that were taken with a compact camera (a perfect test for noise reduction, chromatic aberrations and so on). If you think that would be easy, well, I actually had to run a program to recover some pics from my cards.
Unfortunately, DXO and Bibble don’t support DNG, so for this test I had to find some RAWs. I made a habit years ago to convert all my pics to DNG.
Test imagesįor this test I found myself in the difficult position of not having enough test images. Originally, this article presented the beta version of Bibble 5, once it was released I retested and included new results from it.
It’s good to keep in mind however that it may add features and/or improve image quality before it is released.
#Capture one vs lightroom software
In the case of Silky Pix, I started testing it, but I felt it’s not in the same league as the others, so a direct comparison would not be fair.Īlso, in the case of Lightroom 3, it is still beta software I decided that it’s stable enough to be used in production, so it wouldn’t be unfair to it.
#Capture one vs lightroom Pc
I did not select Aperture for this review because it’s older (apart from updates and patches it’s still a 2008 product) and it’s also the only Mac-only product (all the programs in this test are available for both PC and Mac Bibble is also available for Linux). Notable absents would be Apple Aperture and Silky Pix.
#Capture one vs lightroom professional
With new releases in RAW processing software, I decided to take a look at the newest professional programs and see how they measure up in terms of image quality, features, UI and speed.
0 kommentar(er)
